Health Savings Accounts and High-Deductible Health Plans: “HSAs coupled with high-deductible health plans increase cost-consciousness among enrollees, but have little effect on overall health care costs.” The Bell Policy Center
No ‘health savings’ scams; time for single-payer is now: “A RAND Corp. study demonstrated that when hypertensive patients had to pay part of the bill, they had a 10% higher death rate. Certainly if people die earlier we will reduce our health care costs, but that sounds too much like a Philip Morris study I once read. We can do better.”
“Even partial payment by the patient can be counter-productive, like co-pays, which usually cost more than they save. It was shown in a Kaiser Family Foundation study that mothers in low-income families will too often forego their blood pressure medicine to put food on the table, and then they have a stroke or heart attack or, worse, die. This sounds neither compassionate nor conservative.”
Jack E. Lohman
Health Care Waste
From Maggie Mahar: “With its decades of data, Dartmouth [Medical School] has exposed the incredible waste in the U.S. health-care system. Sizing up the evidence, Wennberg estimates that up to one-third of the over $2 trillion that we now spend annually on health care is squandered on unnecessary hospitalizations; unneeded and often redundant tests; unproven treatments; over-priced, cutting-edge drugs; devices no better than the less expensive products they replaced; and end-of-life care that brings neither comfort nor cure.”
So, eliminating the 31% of insurance bureaucracy systemic waste drops the legitimate costs from $2.2 trillion to $1.38 trillion, and cutting 33% of physician and hospital waste out of that drops to $910 billion what our total health care costs should really be, a total 55% savings. Over half of our health care costs are wasted and dispensable! Is it any wonder that our healthcare costs are double everybody else’s?
Costs of Health Care Administration in the United States and Canada (Steffie Woolhandler, M.D., M.P.H., Terry Campbell, M.H.A., and David U. Himmelstein, M.D.) (by New England Journal of Medicine and www.pnhp.org)
“In 1999, health administration costs totaled at least $294.3 billion in the United States, or $1,059 per capita, as compared with $307 per capita in Canada. After exclusions, administration accounted for 31.0 percent of health care expenditures in the United States and 16.7 percent of health care expenditures in Canada. Canada’s national health insurance program had overhead of 1.3 percent; the overhead among Canada’s private insurers was higher than that in the United States (13.2 percent vs. 11.7 percent). Providers’ administrative costs were far lower in Canada. Between 1969 and 1999, the share of the U.S. health care labor force accounted for by administrative workers grew from 18.2 percent to 27.3 percent. In Canada, it grew from 16.0 percent in 1971 to 19.1 percent in 1996. (Both nations’ figures exclude insurance-industry personnel.)”
RAC-king Up Medicare Savings: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released its most recent analysis of improper payments in the Medicare program on November 17, 2008. The good news is that vigorous cost recovery programs have helped whittle the percentage of improper payments in the Medicare fee-for-service program from 3.9 percent in FY 2007 to 3.6 percent this year. But that still means that Medicare bled $10.4 billion in improper payments in FY 2008. Improper payments are any incorrect payment made to a service provider. Not surprisingly, the majority tend to be overpayments.
Bush’s False Claims About Children’s Health Insurance (by FactCheck.org) President Bush gave a false description of proposed legislation to expand the 10-year-old federal program to provide health insurance for children in low-income working families.
Another “free market” phenomenon, as reported by the New England Journal of Medicine, is that 94% of physicians receive some form of consulting fee or financial favors from drug and device manufacturers, and then are expected to prescribe without favoring one product’s capabilities over the other. Thus the very corporations that espouse the free market are doing everything they can to subvert it, all while our politicians turn a blind eye. Beyond the issue of medical ethics, these industry costs that corrupt the system are also passed on to the patient.
We are all paying for everybody’s health care, no matter how you figure it. Whether through employer premiums, cost shifting because of someone’s unpaid emergency room visit, or someone’s bankruptcy costs. Or lastly, when employers add their costs to the price of their product and we reimburse them at the cash register. Nobody gets a free lunch, not even the unemployed or welfare recipients.
So why don’t we simply eliminate the enormous waste in the system and provide healthcare to all? We could provide first class healthcare (call it CheneyCare) to 100% of our population for the same 16% of Gross Domestic Product that we are spending today. And in the process we’d relieve employers of the healthcare burden and make them more competitive with foreign products that do not have healthcare built into their costs.
Do we need controls? Of course. But high deductible HSAs are not the answer. Perhaps the first three doctors visits per year are free, then an independent nurse facilitator determines whether a chronic problem justifies further free visits or a co-pay kicks in. But co-pays can be counterproductive and further study is needed here.
Competition in healthcare is wishful thinking. Few people will go to the lowest bidder, because low cost often indicates a physician not able to attract patients or a hospital that skimps on cleanliness or technology. So the opposite will be true as the higher priced providers will be at an advantage.
Ten needed fixes for the health care system — First and foremost, the solutions are political. Totally! Not because politicians don’t know how to fix the problem, but because they are being paid not to.
Is Canadian health care right for Wisconsin? — Not totally, but the model is ideal. Healthy Wisconsin will be 50% better funded to eliminate wait times. We’ll use the same private doctors and hospitals, just redirect the 31% of bureaucracy waste toward health care instead.
Health care and the free market — Politicians prefer “the free market” even though it is the free market that took over in 1994 that has gotten us into today’s mess. They favor “privatization” because, they argue, it “adds competition and controls costs.” That’s pure hogwash. It does neither.
Big Pharma, the other elephant in the room— Over 80% of pharmaceuticals are me-too drugs, designed to imrove profitability rather than care.
Paying for health care is not rocket science — The best, simplest, least costly, most effective thing we could do is expand what has been working so well for 50 years, Medicare. You get sick, you get care, and the caregiver gets paid. Guaranteed. Nothing could be simpler.
Price competition in health care is a pipe dream — There is no such thing as price competition in the health care industry, at least not the way we might perceive it. And should we ever get to that point, few patients who are really sick will seek out the lowest bidder for themselves or their kids. It isn’t going to happen.
Competition in a publicly funded healthcare system — Are the UK and other countries right to adopt a market based model for improving their health services? Steffie Woolhandler and David Himmelstein believe that the appropriate response to the US experience with such policies is quarantine, not replication. Why would anyone choose to emulate the US healthcare system? Costs per capita are about twice the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development average. Forty seven million people are completely uninsured. Many others with insurance face high out of pocket costs that hinder care and bankrupt more than a million annually. Mortality statistics lag behind those of most other wealthy countries, and even for the insured population, clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction are mediocre.
Many Doctors, Many Tests, No Rhyme or Reason – By Sandeep Jauhar, M.D. – “I recently took care of a 50-year-old man who had been admitted to the hospital short of breath. During his monthlong stay he was seen by a hematologist, an endocrinologist, a kidney specialist, a podiatrist, two cardiologists, a cardiac electrophysiologist, an infectious-diseases specialist, a pulmonologist, an ear-nose-throat specialist, a urologist, a gastroenterologist, a neurologist, a nutritionist, a general surgeon, a thoracic surgeon and a pain specialist.” (click above to view complete article)
MedicareAdvantage plans are usually fine, until you get really sick and need care. The Medicare Rights Center found serious problems when, too often, these plans did not provide the care they promise. This has prompted several state attorney generals to sue the companies on behalf of patients.
….. HSAs? Delaying the inevitable and
Stories on Medicare Advantage Plans:
Print this page and links HERE
Sign up to Lohman’s twice-monthly newsletter by sending a blank email to email@example.com with “Subscribe eNewsletter” in the subject field.