<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/</link>
	<description>It would not matter who got elected if cash bribes didn&#039;t change hands in the process.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:41:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kohl and Feingold are out to lunch! &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-1111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kohl and Feingold are out to lunch! &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 08:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-1111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] we&#8217;d pay for it differently; through taxes rather than wages. But it would bail out 100% of our companies that spend 15% of their wages on health care. Not just the banks and car manufacturers. And it [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;d pay for it differently; through taxes rather than wages. But it would bail out 100% of our companies that spend 15% of their wages on health care. Not just the banks and car manufacturers. And it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is Medicare-for-all? &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[What is Medicare-for-all? &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:49:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-1009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] just one company out of the thousands outsourcing. Medicare-for-all would be this country&#8217;s wisest bailout ever, for 100% of businesses and not just the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] just one company out of the thousands outsourcing. Medicare-for-all would be this country&#8217;s wisest bailout ever, for 100% of businesses and not just the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Community must get behind single-payer health insurance &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Business Community must get behind single-payer health insurance &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 10:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] per year; it would save every US Corporation $6500 per employee per year in health care premiums. How’s that for a bailout?  But this one isn’t going to just the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] per year; it would save every US Corporation $6500 per employee per year in health care premiums. How’s that for a bailout?  But this one isn’t going to just the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prepare for health care&#8230; failure! &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Prepare for health care&#8230; failure! &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 06:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] The health of the nation is important, but we must also protect the health of our economy. Employer cost for premiums are $6500 here and $800 in Canada. US companies are at a severe competitive disadvantage because we have saddled them with this expense as no other nation has. Rather than bailing out our greedy bankers, we should bail out our other employers instead. See Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout.  [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The health of the nation is important, but we must also protect the health of our economy. Employer cost for premiums are $6500 here and $800 in Canada. US companies are at a severe competitive disadvantage because we have saddled them with this expense as no other nation has. Rather than bailing out our greedy bankers, we should bail out our other employers instead. See Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama’s stimulus sucks&#8230;. &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama’s stimulus sucks&#8230;. &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] zero sense to support the thousands of health care plans and all of their administrative costs. Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout. The insurance CEOs won&#8217;t like it but it makes the most sense for the country. Let&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] zero sense to support the thousands of health care plans and all of their administrative costs. Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout. The insurance CEOs won&#8217;t like it but it makes the most sense for the country. Let&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama’s stimulus sucks&#8230; &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama’s stimulus sucks&#8230; &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 06:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] zero sense to support the thousands of health care plans and all of their administrative costs. Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout. The insurance CEOs won&#8217;t like it but it makes the most sense for the country. Let&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] zero sense to support the thousands of health care plans and all of their administrative costs. Medicare-for-all is best corporate bailout. The insurance CEOs won&#8217;t like it but it makes the most sense for the country. Let&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyedPoliticians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MoneyedPoliticians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 19:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Paulette. Note also that Rep. Ryan also voted for the 2003 Medicare Drug program that passed $780 billion to the pharmaceutical industry and prohibitied Medicare from negotiating for lower drug prices. So did Sensenbrenner. With friends like these we certainly don&#039;t need enemies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Paulette. Note also that Rep. Ryan also voted for the 2003 Medicare Drug program that passed $780 billion to the pharmaceutical industry and prohibitied Medicare from negotiating for lower drug prices. So did Sensenbrenner. With friends like these we certainly don&#8217;t need enemies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulette Garin</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paulette Garin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 17:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The REAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS

Originally published February 6, 2009

TARP otherwise known as the Wall Street Bailout

Yesterday, Elizabeth Warren, Harvard Law Professor who now chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel responsible for reporting on the billions given away through TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) or &quot;Wall Street Bailout&quot; told Congress yesterday that the government &quot;overpaid&quot; $78 Billion for the purchase of troubled assets. 

Let&#039;s see, our GOP Congressman here in Wisconsin&#039;s 1st District voted for the TARP Bailout. In fact, he took credit for being one of the main architects to revamp the bill so that it could pass through both houses of congress and be signed by our now former president. I wonder if he has a plan to recover the $78 Billion?

American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 or Economic Stimulus Package

As I write this post, the U.S. Senate is debating the Economic Stimulus package which has now ballooned to an amazing $900 Billion plus. This does not even take into consideration the interest that will accrue, because we will have to borrow all the money needed to pay for this piece of legislation. Granted there are some very good items to consider in this bill, but how much of it will stimulate our economy now versus how much is intended for one or two years from now? How much of the bill will actually stimulate our economy period? Do we have to pass one massive bill immediately or under duress conditions only to realize that decisions made with calm heads and careful deliberation may produce better more fiscally responsible long term results?

What is the real economic stimulus? HEALTH CARE.

Single Payer/Medicare - An Economic Stimulus Plan for the Nation

In an article by Bruce Dixon for the Black Agenda Report he highlights the following:

&quot;According to a study released January 14 by the California Nurses Association, adopting a single payer system of universal health care in the US would create 2.6 million new jobs, as many as the Bush economy destroyed in 2006, and boost the revenues of private employers by an annual $317 billion. A single payer health care system would put more than $100 billion in the pockets of employees and add $44 billion to state, local and federal budgets in badly needed tax revenues.&quot;

&quot;The California Nurses Association study goes a long way toward proving that universal single payer national health care may be the best medicine not only for our health care holes and disparities, but for the economy itself. Whether the politicians who ran just weeks ago promising a national health care plan will take the prescribed medicine depends on our insistence, our tenacity, and our refusal to be distracted. People deserve universal health care, and the 2.6 million jobs created by single payer health care are equal to the president&#039;s claims for the entire stimulus package. It&#039;s time to take the medicine. &quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The REAL ECONOMIC STIMULUS</p>
<p>Originally published February 6, 2009</p>
<p>TARP otherwise known as the Wall Street Bailout</p>
<p>Yesterday, Elizabeth Warren, Harvard Law Professor who now chairs the Congressional Oversight Panel responsible for reporting on the billions given away through TARP (Troubled Assets Relief Program) or &#8220;Wall Street Bailout&#8221; told Congress yesterday that the government &#8220;overpaid&#8221; $78 Billion for the purchase of troubled assets. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see, our GOP Congressman here in Wisconsin&#8217;s 1st District voted for the TARP Bailout. In fact, he took credit for being one of the main architects to revamp the bill so that it could pass through both houses of congress and be signed by our now former president. I wonder if he has a plan to recover the $78 Billion?</p>
<p>American Recovery and Reinvestment Act 2009 or Economic Stimulus Package</p>
<p>As I write this post, the U.S. Senate is debating the Economic Stimulus package which has now ballooned to an amazing $900 Billion plus. This does not even take into consideration the interest that will accrue, because we will have to borrow all the money needed to pay for this piece of legislation. Granted there are some very good items to consider in this bill, but how much of it will stimulate our economy now versus how much is intended for one or two years from now? How much of the bill will actually stimulate our economy period? Do we have to pass one massive bill immediately or under duress conditions only to realize that decisions made with calm heads and careful deliberation may produce better more fiscally responsible long term results?</p>
<p>What is the real economic stimulus? HEALTH CARE.</p>
<p>Single Payer/Medicare &#8211; An Economic Stimulus Plan for the Nation</p>
<p>In an article by Bruce Dixon for the Black Agenda Report he highlights the following:</p>
<p>&#8220;According to a study released January 14 by the California Nurses Association, adopting a single payer system of universal health care in the US would create 2.6 million new jobs, as many as the Bush economy destroyed in 2006, and boost the revenues of private employers by an annual $317 billion. A single payer health care system would put more than $100 billion in the pockets of employees and add $44 billion to state, local and federal budgets in badly needed tax revenues.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;The California Nurses Association study goes a long way toward proving that universal single payer national health care may be the best medicine not only for our health care holes and disparities, but for the economy itself. Whether the politicians who ran just weeks ago promising a national health care plan will take the prescribed medicine depends on our insistence, our tenacity, and our refusal to be distracted. People deserve universal health care, and the 2.6 million jobs created by single payer health care are equal to the president&#8217;s claims for the entire stimulus package. It&#8217;s time to take the medicine. &#8220;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The stimulus: Extending a two-year fix to ten. &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The stimulus: Extending a two-year fix to ten. &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 12:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] at health care. The only proposal not on the table is the best one, HR676 Medicare-for-all by Rep. John Conyers. That&#8217;s because it eliminates the biggest waste, the insurance [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at health care. The only proposal not on the table is the best one, HR676 Medicare-for-all by Rep. John Conyers. That&#8217;s because it eliminates the biggest waste, the insurance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Health care delayed&#8230; maybe. &#171; Moneyed Politicians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-515</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Health care delayed&#8230; maybe. &#171; Moneyed Politicians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 10:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-515</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Medicare-for-all would save every corporation in Wisconsin and the United States $6000 per employee per year, and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Medicare-for-all would save every corporation in Wisconsin and the United States $6000 per employee per year, and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyedPoliticians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MoneyedPoliticians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-478</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don, having been a CEO in the health care field for 25 years, let me redefine your &quot;profits.&quot; They are, after all of the necessities are paid for, what you can take home and put in your piggy bank. Responsible CEOs will spend most of it on future growth or on technology expansion. Irresponsible CEOs will cut back on patient services and staff so they have more to take home. Add for-profit hospitals and insurers to the latter. 

I don&#039;t like &quot;insurers&quot; when it comes to patients having to put their lives in somebody else&#039;s hands. Sounds too much like the Mafia. I like to think of Medicare more as an administrator of payments. They make no profits, they simply pay the bills. Could it be privatized? Well, hospitals, doctors and the WPS administrator in Madison already are. I think my #1 and #2 above minimizes the governments&#039; involvement about as much as we need to. 

Jack]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, having been a CEO in the health care field for 25 years, let me redefine your &#8220;profits.&#8221; They are, after all of the necessities are paid for, what you can take home and put in your piggy bank. Responsible CEOs will spend most of it on future growth or on technology expansion. Irresponsible CEOs will cut back on patient services and staff so they have more to take home. Add for-profit hospitals and insurers to the latter. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like &#8220;insurers&#8221; when it comes to patients having to put their lives in somebody else&#8217;s hands. Sounds too much like the Mafia. I like to think of Medicare more as an administrator of payments. They make no profits, they simply pay the bills. Could it be privatized? Well, hospitals, doctors and the WPS administrator in Madison already are. I think my #1 and #2 above minimizes the governments&#8217; involvement about as much as we need to. </p>
<p>Jack</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Levit</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Levit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack:
I share your concerns of politicians and the Congress which comprises them.
I also am in agreement with your characterization of for-profit hospitals and for-profit insurers, to the extent that short-term profits are favored over long-term sustainability.
Profitability, in and of itself, is a neutral term.
It simply means that revenues exceed costs.
The reason that is so, is because value is added.
Simply passing on costs, because the business perceives the market can bear more expenses, is not adding value.

You are in favor of Medicare expansion, because you believe it is the better of the 2 choices today.
What type of an &quot;insurer&quot; could you conceive of, that could be an even better third choice?
I am thinking of a not-for-profit, tax exempt insurer which does not provide products and services that are now available commercially.
Don Levit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack:<br />
I share your concerns of politicians and the Congress which comprises them.<br />
I also am in agreement with your characterization of for-profit hospitals and for-profit insurers, to the extent that short-term profits are favored over long-term sustainability.<br />
Profitability, in and of itself, is a neutral term.<br />
It simply means that revenues exceed costs.<br />
The reason that is so, is because value is added.<br />
Simply passing on costs, because the business perceives the market can bear more expenses, is not adding value.</p>
<p>You are in favor of Medicare expansion, because you believe it is the better of the 2 choices today.<br />
What type of an &#8220;insurer&#8221; could you conceive of, that could be an even better third choice?<br />
I am thinking of a not-for-profit, tax exempt insurer which does not provide products and services that are now available commercially.<br />
Don Levit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyedPoliticians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MoneyedPoliticians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-476</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let me also address what I believe will help turn around Medicare. 

1) Create a health care board of directors consisting of 15 experienced members from the industry and academia, including doctors and hospital CEOs, all retired people but most certainly people without any connection to health care today. No politicians. Let them lay out the rules of coverage and non-coverage. They can hear testimony from all sides of the issue, but they rule the roost.

2) Convert CMS to a workhorse entity that does not create rules but implements those created by the above board and provides oversight of the private area contractors (like our WPS in Wisconsin). 

3) Establish private investigative companies that root out fraud and overuse and are paid on successes only.

4) Eliminate the Medicare Part D Drug program and turn it over to the doctor-pharmacist team. Doctors can write prescriptions and pharmacies can fill them and bill Medicare directly. They’ve been doing this for years so it is not new to them. 

5) Mandate that all politicians be covered by Medicare instead of their gold-plated taxpayer funded policies of today. That’ll ensure its success and proper funding.

6) Require that all hospitals are community owned non-profit entities that are not owned by a for-profit parent. We cannot have patient care or hospital staffing dictated by profitability.

7) Mandate that all hospitals and clinics tie their patient records into the national VA Medical system&#039;s VistA system. 

There are many more ideas, and I’ll add them if I think of them. But this should get you started.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me also address what I believe will help turn around Medicare. </p>
<p>1) Create a health care board of directors consisting of 15 experienced members from the industry and academia, including doctors and hospital CEOs, all retired people but most certainly people without any connection to health care today. No politicians. Let them lay out the rules of coverage and non-coverage. They can hear testimony from all sides of the issue, but they rule the roost.</p>
<p>2) Convert CMS to a workhorse entity that does not create rules but implements those created by the above board and provides oversight of the private area contractors (like our WPS in Wisconsin). </p>
<p>3) Establish private investigative companies that root out fraud and overuse and are paid on successes only.</p>
<p>4) Eliminate the Medicare Part D Drug program and turn it over to the doctor-pharmacist team. Doctors can write prescriptions and pharmacies can fill them and bill Medicare directly. They’ve been doing this for years so it is not new to them. </p>
<p>5) Mandate that all politicians be covered by Medicare instead of their gold-plated taxpayer funded policies of today. That’ll ensure its success and proper funding.</p>
<p>6) Require that all hospitals are community owned non-profit entities that are not owned by a for-profit parent. We cannot have patient care or hospital staffing dictated by profitability.</p>
<p>7) Mandate that all hospitals and clinics tie their patient records into the national VA Medical system&#8217;s VistA system. </p>
<p>There are many more ideas, and I’ll add them if I think of them. But this should get you started.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MoneyedPoliticians</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MoneyedPoliticians]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don, you are absolutely correct. Neither one of them is sustainable. But you really must look at the core problem, which is our corrupt political system. Because of that nothing is sustainable. They are making the rules to favor their campaign contributors, and if you are not one of them you will pay the price.

Think about it. From our corrupt politicians we got an unsustainable Medicare system and a trashed economy. In one case the insurance and pharmaceutical industries are walking away with trillions of wasted dollars, and in the other case the bankers, credit and auto industries are doing the same. Why? Because they paid big cash dollars to the politicians who wrote the rules.

Jim Sensenbrenner owns $5 million in pharmaceutical stocks and voted for the $780 billion giveaway to the drug industry that simultaneously blocked Medicare from negotiating the 50% discount the VA system is getting. Public outrage? Nah, he was re-elected with 80% of the vote. Billy Tauzin was instrumental in getting the bill passed and ended up with a $2 million per year job with Big Pharma as a lobbyist. 

Because of campaign contributions the banking and credit industries were deregulated. I don’t have to tell you the results of that.

There IS only one solution: public funding of campaigns. For $10 per taxpayer per year these politicians would be working for the taxpayers instead of the greedy CEOs that are draining the system of trillions of dollars every year. Get the money out of the political system and politicians will make the right decisions. If that turns out to satisfy Ken, and we trash Medicare and Social Security, fine. But at least we’ll know that this was their stupid decision rather than the stupid decision of some special interest that wanted in our pockets.

And all of this ‘government borrowing from itself” wouldn’t be happening with a non-conflicted congress. I think it is in Singapore that they execute corrupt politicians. I don’t advocate that, but long jail times are in order.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don, you are absolutely correct. Neither one of them is sustainable. But you really must look at the core problem, which is our corrupt political system. Because of that nothing is sustainable. They are making the rules to favor their campaign contributors, and if you are not one of them you will pay the price.</p>
<p>Think about it. From our corrupt politicians we got an unsustainable Medicare system and a trashed economy. In one case the insurance and pharmaceutical industries are walking away with trillions of wasted dollars, and in the other case the bankers, credit and auto industries are doing the same. Why? Because they paid big cash dollars to the politicians who wrote the rules.</p>
<p>Jim Sensenbrenner owns $5 million in pharmaceutical stocks and voted for the $780 billion giveaway to the drug industry that simultaneously blocked Medicare from negotiating the 50% discount the VA system is getting. Public outrage? Nah, he was re-elected with 80% of the vote. Billy Tauzin was instrumental in getting the bill passed and ended up with a $2 million per year job with Big Pharma as a lobbyist. </p>
<p>Because of campaign contributions the banking and credit industries were deregulated. I don’t have to tell you the results of that.</p>
<p>There IS only one solution: public funding of campaigns. For $10 per taxpayer per year these politicians would be working for the taxpayers instead of the greedy CEOs that are draining the system of trillions of dollars every year. Get the money out of the political system and politicians will make the right decisions. If that turns out to satisfy Ken, and we trash Medicare and Social Security, fine. But at least we’ll know that this was their stupid decision rather than the stupid decision of some special interest that wanted in our pockets.</p>
<p>And all of this ‘government borrowing from itself” wouldn’t be happening with a non-conflicted congress. I think it is in Singapore that they execute corrupt politicians. I don’t advocate that, but long jail times are in order.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Levit</title>
		<link>http://moneyedpoliticians.net/2009/01/05/medicare-for-all-is-best-corporate-bailout/#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Don Levit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://moneyedpoliticians.wordpress.com/?p=2363#comment-474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jack:
When you say that Medicare is the better of the 2 choices today, you may be right.
Both the commercial market and Medicare are not sustainable, imo.
It is also the opinion of the GAO and the CBO that Medicare is not suistainable.
I can provide the excerpts from a recent report by the GAO to that effect.
One of the major problems that the report discloses is that the money that you and I pay into the trust funds never make it into the funds.
Rather, the funds are notional accounts, in which the money is credited to the trust funds, but actually remains in the Treasury&#039;s General Fund, which is used for general expenses of the federal government.
Treasury securities are placed into the trust funds, not cash or cash-equivalent securities.
In effect, the government is borrowing from itself, similarly to it borrowing from the public.
However, unlike borrowing from the public, when the government borrows from itself, an asset is created, in the form of trust fund IOUs.
From an accounting perspective, the government considers this a wash, with the so-called asset cancelling the liability.
This is a deceptive way to account for the trust fund obligations, imo.
If the federal government were a private insurer, the reserves accumulated in the trust funds would be disallowed by the state departments of insurance.
It reminds me of a saying my grandfather had:  &quot;What you owe, you owe.
What you own, you may not own.&quot;
Wise words, even if you&#039;re the federal government, with the ability to tax the populace, and create deficits.
Don Levit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack:<br />
When you say that Medicare is the better of the 2 choices today, you may be right.<br />
Both the commercial market and Medicare are not sustainable, imo.<br />
It is also the opinion of the GAO and the CBO that Medicare is not suistainable.<br />
I can provide the excerpts from a recent report by the GAO to that effect.<br />
One of the major problems that the report discloses is that the money that you and I pay into the trust funds never make it into the funds.<br />
Rather, the funds are notional accounts, in which the money is credited to the trust funds, but actually remains in the Treasury&#8217;s General Fund, which is used for general expenses of the federal government.<br />
Treasury securities are placed into the trust funds, not cash or cash-equivalent securities.<br />
In effect, the government is borrowing from itself, similarly to it borrowing from the public.<br />
However, unlike borrowing from the public, when the government borrows from itself, an asset is created, in the form of trust fund IOUs.<br />
From an accounting perspective, the government considers this a wash, with the so-called asset cancelling the liability.<br />
This is a deceptive way to account for the trust fund obligations, imo.<br />
If the federal government were a private insurer, the reserves accumulated in the trust funds would be disallowed by the state departments of insurance.<br />
It reminds me of a saying my grandfather had:  &#8220;What you owe, you owe.<br />
What you own, you may not own.&#8221;<br />
Wise words, even if you&#8217;re the federal government, with the ability to tax the populace, and create deficits.<br />
Don Levit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

